-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 05:29 AM 1/22/01 GMT, David Wagner wrote:
>Free markets may be the best hope we've got (or they may not), but
>in any case, wouldn't it be fair to say that reliance on free markets
>to eliminate content protection is a little risky?
[...]
>Now su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://world.std.com/~cme/html/padlock.html
It's self-explanatory.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.2
iQA/AwUBOnSoNXPxfjyW5ytxEQLviwCfahPcp0FGP+1UB4cs0J6MlN2Em20AoMhq
CHIn1FgxwKhGz8LR9S6WzSkF
=/Izn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 05:28 PM 1/25/01 -0600, (Mr) Lyn R. Kennedy wrote:
>First the basics:
>
> 1. An electronic election system need only be as good as the current
> system. While perfection remains the goal, the minimum criteria
> is that it be no worse.
Aft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 03:31 PM 2/14/01 +0200, Paul N wrote:
>
>It is secure to make a onetime pad using 16 bit input from soundcard using
>the following algorithm?
>
>Each bit of the output is the result of XOR-ing all 16 bits from the input
>sample... so, for making
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
At 07:27 PM 12/4/98 -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
>The new Wassenar abomination has to be the end of this, one way or
>another.
Amen, brother Metzger.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.3
iQCVAwUBNmjrCRN3Wx8QwqUtAQHi6QP+In7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Oops -- I didn't mean to send that last reply to the whole list. Oh well.
Although I share your anger and desire for a show-down, I worry about the
result. Back when the Clipper chip was fresh in the papers was the time for
this showdown. There is so littl
M Taylor wrote:
> In my limited experience of dealing with administrators, they question why
> they should worry about privacy of other people's personal information,
> citing the general rise in data warehousing and the old saying "if you've
> got nothing to hide..."
>
> So I'm looking for piece
At 09:18 PM 5/7/99 -0700, Jay D. Dyson wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
>On Fri, 7 May 1999, Anonymous wrote:
>
>> Here's Lance Rose's take on the Bernstein decision:
>>
>> Sorry to say, but the 9th Circuit took the dumb approach I mentioned in my
>> earlier post.
>> Their who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
At 02:26 PM 5/8/99 -0700, EKR wrote:
>Carl Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Source code is human speech, for human-to-human communication. It has a
>> side-effect of being compilable into machine code, but it is in a human
>&g
>From my declaration for the Bernstein case:
http://www.eff.org/pub/Privacy/ITAR_export/Bernstein_case/Legal/960726_filing/ellison.decl
"18. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is an excerpt from the August
1967 CACM, giving another example of an article which consists solely of
source code.
Markus Kuhn wrote:
>
> "MIKE SHAW" wrote on 1999-06-01 15:43 UTC:
> > Can anyone recommend some entry level cryptography books?
> > I'm looking for something that will just start to get into the
> > nitty-gritty of the math involved.
>
> Those who are more comfortable with reading German than M
Matt Crawford wrote:
>
> As some sort of a physicist, I the way the word entropy is used in
> crypto does not bother me at all. It corresponds well with the
> statistical mechanics definition of entropy as a measure of the
> number of microstates of a system which correspond to the same
> macros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 06:40 PM 12/13/99 -, lcs Mixmaster Remailer wrote:
>However this is just the first step in an effective compromise. Now you
>need to get him to use a bogus certificate when he thinks he is using
>a good one. He tries to connect to a secure si
13 matches
Mail list logo
