RE: outlook certs - solved

Markku-Juhani Saarinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>I now believe you've decoded the below incorrectly because the leading >>bit is set, making this a signed number which may have made some of your >>tools croak. Decoding by hand, I get the following mod/exp: >Are you saying that under some con

Electronic Signatures Yield Unpleasant Surprises

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Electronic Signatures Yield Unpleasant Surprises Knowledgeable Internet users might think that the "Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act" -- passed overwhelmingly by the US Congress last week -- would provide virtual world commerce with the

FYI: a pessimistic look at security

--- begin forwarded text Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 11:57:38 +0100 To: Digital Bearer Settlement List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "R. A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: FYI: a pessimistic look at security Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe:

CHES 2000 accepted papers

--- begin forwarded text Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 01:58:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Christof Paar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WPI.Crypto.Seminar":; Subject: CHES 2000 accepted papers Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Christof Paar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please find below the list of accepted papers for CHE

Re: Extracting Entropy?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- At 08:48 AM 6/20/00 +0100, Paul Crowley wrote: ... >If you don't mind the limitation of 1k of internal state, then >Panama could be used directly; push in your salt and passphrase, >padding to the edge of the block with one followed by zeroes, then >do 32 blank

Re: Electronic Signatures Yield Unpleasant Surprises

On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, William Allen Simpson wrote: < . . . . > > Surprise! Many consumers comparison shop on-line, but quit before > purchasing, making their final purchase at a later time in a > conventional manner. Vendors are now permitted another new fee for > "withdrawal of consent". > >