[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Jeff says/asks,
>
> > A commonly-held conception in the commercial world (in my experience) is that
> > most threats to "corporate security" come from the Internet-at-large, and
> > therefore being behind a firewall is a Good Thing and generally Sufficient.
>
> I be
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
>A commonly-held conception in the commercial world (in my experience) is that
>most threats to "corporate security" come from the Internet-at-large, and
>therefore being behind a firewall is a Good Thing and generally Sufficient.
>
>Of
http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/tim/99/09/29/timintint02001.html?1341
861
No Safety in Numbers
After an Israeli research institute said it could break Europe's banking
codes in less than a second, an intitiative has been launched that could
result in unbreakable codes.
The European In
At 08:57 AM 10/4/99 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
>How does this trojan horse or virus get onto the targetted computer? I
>don't know what you run behind your firewalls, but I certainly don't run
>anything that could get trojaned or virused.
Yes, but you're not the only one on your LAN. Is everyone a
"K. M. Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/tim/99/09/29/timintint02001.html?1341861
This story is like the creeping slow spam from hell, I think it's
now appeared once on every crypto list I read.
It consists of a series of out-of-context extracts, half
Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> How does this trojan horse or virus get onto the targetted computer? I
>> don't know what you run behind your firewalls, but I certainly don't run
>> anything that could get trojaned or virused.
There are very few interesting sites which don't have large
