[Zero-Knowledge Press Release] ZERO-KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS SECURES$12M IN CAPITAL FUNDING

1999-10-01 Thread Robert Hettinga
--- begin forwarded text From: Dov Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ZKS Press Releases <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Zero-Knowledge Press Release] ZERO-KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS SECURES $12M IN CAPITAL FUNDING Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 10:33:55 -0400 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==

CRYPTO NAZIS

1999-10-01 Thread Robert Hettinga
[This is basically just a rant. If that's not what you want to read, I suggest skipping it. --Perry] --- begin forwarded text Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 09:30:54 -0400 Reply-To: Law & Policy of Computer Communications <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Law & Policy of Computer Communications <[

Export ?

1999-10-01 Thread Andy Maslar
At the risk of being flamed for being a hopeless newbie, or perhaps as one asking a practical question about export regs, (something that seems in bad taste lately) I will nevertheless proceed: Are hash functions (MD5 specifically) controlled by export regs? Of course I know that any answer is s

US Patent 5956404

1999-10-01 Thread P.J. Ponder
US Patent Number 5956404 http://www.patents.ibm.com/details?pn=US05956404__ Schneier, Bruce Kelsey, John Abstract: A method for digitally signing a message by a tamper-resistant device to generate a digital signature. The method includes the step of hashing the message to form message bits; an

RE: Rumor of a working quantum computer

1999-10-01 Thread Trei, Peter
Keith Dawson[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes: >Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 9:00 AM >Subject: Rumor of a working quantum computer >To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Anyone heard word on this rumor? The Sunday Times story claims >that a European Institute of Quantum Computing Network has

Internal vs external threats, any references?

1999-10-01 Thread Jeff . Hodges
A commonly-held conception in the commercial world (in my experience) is that most threats to "corporate security" come from the Internet-at-large, and therefore being behind a firewall is a Good Thing and generally Sufficient. Of course there are many references in the literature which dispute

["NewsScan" ] NewsScan Daily, 1 October 1999 ("Above The Fold")

1999-10-01 Thread Perry E. Metzger
--- Start of forwarded message --- Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "NewsScan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Multiple recipients of list newsscan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 06:10:52 -0700 Subject: NewsScan Daily, 1 October 1999 ("Above The Fold") Repl