At 12:41 PM 9/20/99 -0700, Rob Lemos wrote:
>
>
>
>Can anyone recommend a good product for encrypting information on the fly,
>meaning encrypt the file when you close it and decrypt it when you open it.
>It would also be nice if it would ask you whether you wanted the file you
>are just closing to
I will be on stage at a minor league debating forum with Bill Reinsch
on Thursday of this week.
If you had one question you would want asked, what would it be?
Reply directly, please. I'll read it all late Wednesday.
--dan
A slight correction is noted, which isn't very relevant to the
ZK proofs in the proposed payment system.
At 11:41 AM 9/20/99 -0700, bram wrote:
> Interactive ZK proofs can be made non-interactive by generating an
> encoding of the information offered by the prover, and using the bits of
> the sec
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 at 01:52:43PM -0700, Wei Dai wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 09:02:17PM +0200, Anonymous wrote:
> > Yeah, neat idea! With b-money, newly minted value goes directly into
> > someone's account, but if it was used instead to create an anonymous
> > coin you would have an account
> The Cato Institute released a new Cato Briefing Paper, "Strong
> Cryptography: The Global Tide of Change," as the Clinton
> administration was announcing a relaxation in controls on the export
> of encryption technology. In the paper, Arnold G. Reinhold writes ...
Arnold's a regular on this lis
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 12:41:41PM -0700, Rob Lemos wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good product for encrypting information on the fly,
> meaning encrypt the file when you close it and decrypt it when you open it.
You don't specify what OS you're using, but I'd suggest something from
the general
> If you had one question you would want asked, what would it be?
Why did the result of your year-long review of encryption policy
ignore the blatant unconstitutionality that the Justice Department's
Office of Legal Counsel found 20 years ago and that two Federal courts
have confirmed recently?
At 10:27 AM -0400 9/20/99, Robert Hettinga wrote:
>I remember Ian, Adam, and I talking about the
>card-in-a-floppy thing at CFP '96.
>
>Soulda, woulda, coulda, and all that...
>
>Cheers,
>RAH
>
>--- begin forwarded text
>
>
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 08:50:44 -0500
>To: [EM
> If you had one question you would
> want asked, what would it be?
Sorry ... 2 questions ...
Why does the executive branch keep
trying to foreclose judicial review
of encryption export policy?
Why did you try to censor your fax
to the California State Legislature
that begged them not to make a
Everyone's probably heard of the new Palm-alike Visor by now, and
it's got this "springboard" slot in the back processors, memory, and
other stuff.
The Palm's security model is, by most accounts I've seen, non-existant.
Is the Visor any better?
It would be nice to have a portable cryptographi
> From: Robert Hettinga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Everyone's probably heard of the new Palm-alike Visor by now, and
> it's got this "springboard" slot in the back processors, memory, and
> other stuff.
> It would be nice to have a portable cryptographic/signature/digital
> money device. Are
In message , Arnold Reinhold writes:
> And what is the value proposition for the consumer? SSL works swell.
Bingo. Consumers will adopt this if and only if cost savings are passed on to
them, which in turn can only happen if the credit card companies (a)
The Visor uses Palm OS, so I don't think it's any better.
Peter Trei
> --
> From: Robert Hettinga[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 2:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Digital Bearer
> Settlement List
> Subject: Is There a
13 matches
Mail list logo