I am not a conspiracy nut. I think Oswald killed Kennedy all by
himself; Roosevelt had no idea Pearl Harbor was about to be attacked;
and Ben & Jerry only wanted to make great ice cream. But I think
people are underestimating NSA if they think they would be afraid to
introduce crypto vulnerabi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Blaze writes:
>> But I still don't believe there are secret back-doors in commercial OSes
>> because such things are too hard to keep secret. And I think the Lotus
>> incident is more evidence that NSA isn't going to try to keep something
>> like that secret s
> While writing about OS back-doors, I said:
>
> >I'm incredibly skeptical that Microsoft, IBM, or any other vendor
> >intentionally provides back-doors for the NSA or anyone else.
>
> This was too strong, because there is in fact a counterexample that I'd
> forgotten while composing that e-mail
While writing about OS back-doors, I said:
>I'm incredibly skeptical that Microsoft, IBM, or any other vendor
>intentionally provides back-doors for the NSA or anyone else.
This was too strong, because there is in fact a counterexample that I'd
forgotten while composing that e-mail.
Jim Gillogy
Regarding the following article:
>>From The Register,
>http://www.theregister.co.uk/000412-20.html
>-
>Posted 12/04/2000 5:56pm by Graham Lea ...
> . The
>Register has seen an unofficial transcript of a luncheon meeting on Capitol
>Hill of the Internet Caucus Panel Discussion about the ne
