Re: Ecash without a mint, or - making anonymous payments practical

1999-09-29 Thread Bill Stewart
>On Mon, 27 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> One small final comment: physical cash is not really anonymous (bills have >> serial numbers, and certainly coins may contain secret marks. Why? At 02:47 PM 09/27/1999 -0700, bram wrote: >I believe at least part of the reason is to make heists dif

Re: Ecash without a mint, or - making anonymous payments practical

1999-09-27 Thread bram
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > One small final comment: physical cash is not really anonymous (bills have > serial numbers, and certainly coins may contain secret marks. Why? I believe at least part of the reason is to make heists difficult - Places which have loads of nice new

Re: Ecash without a mint, or - making anonymous payments practical

1999-09-27 Thread amir . herzberg
Steve takes an issue with me for my belief that anonymous payments will involve overhead that may make them less popular than non-anonymous payments. He says, > There is no reason to expect anonymous system will be more expensive than > the current book-entry variety, in fact quite the contrary

Re: Ecash without a mint, or - making anonymous payments practical

1999-09-26 Thread Anonymous
Amir Herzberg writes: > (btw, I really wonder what's the point of having a technical discussion > incognito... I hope this is not for a really good/bad reason such as > you are living in some dark country) Yes, regrettably many of us do live in a dark country. Public discussions of cryptographic

Re: Ecash without a mint, or - making anonymous payments practical

1999-09-26 Thread Steve Schear
At 01:36 PM 9/26/99 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >There are two reasons. First, as you say below, there is simply the reality of >there being multiple systems. Second, and more essential, there are some >important advantages e.g. in efficiency to non-anonymous payment mechanisms. >BTW, non-anon

Re: Ecash without a mint, or - making anonymous payments practical

1999-09-26 Thread Ben Laurie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Anonymous says, (btw, I really wonder what's the point of having a technical > discussion incognito... I hope this is not for a really good/bad reason such as > you are living in some dark country), Frankly, I'm somewhat surprised. There are several really obvious re

Re: Ecash without a mint, or - making anonymous payments practical

1999-09-26 Thread amir . herzberg
EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], micropay@IBMIL cc:(bcc: Amir Herzberg/Haifa/IBM) Subject: Re: Ecash without a mint, or - making anonymous payments practical Amir Herzberg says, > Anonymous says, > > > It is still worth considering how to create anonymous payment s

Re: Ecash without a mint, or - making anonymous payments practical

1999-09-23 Thread Anonymous
Amir Herzberg says, > Anonymous says, > > > It is still worth considering how to create anonymous payment systems > > which could be more compatible with other elements of present day society. > > I think we can do this, indeed, we can achieve an even stronger goal: > a payment mechanism that will

Re: Ecash without a mint, or - making anonymous payments practical

1999-09-22 Thread amir . herzberg
Anonymous says, > It is still worth considering how to create anonymous payment systems > which could be more compatible with other elements of present day society. I think we can do this, indeed, we can achieve an even stronger goal: a payment mechanism that will support anonymous payments fo