"William H. Geiger III" wrote:
> >What they _should_ do is use OpenSSL and work on that, instead of
> >reinventing the wheel.
>
> IIRC the OpenSSL project was not accepting code from US sources. Has this policy
>changed?
Hmmm. Weeding out cruft from my mailbox and I found this. Looks like I
did
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Now, I didn't start this thread to argue about licenses. I just wanted
folks to review code, should they be so inclined. So, this is my last
comment. Sorry that someone took umbrage.
Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> William Allen Simpson wrote:
> > I was not aware t
> the OpenSSL project was not accepting code from US sources. Has this policy changed?
Yes. The various members of the openssl-core team either
agree that the current regulations remove their concern; or
feel that even though there are issues it's not worth dealing with now
US co
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/18/00
at 02:09 PM, Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>William Allen Simpson wrote:
>>
>> Fallout from the early RSA release into public domain, the references
>> to BSAFE have been replaced, and a bunch of stuff are GPL. Is there
>> a team of folks doing ind
William Allen Simpson wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Ben Laurie wrote:
> >
> > As far as I can tell, the problems are invented rather than real. At
> > least I can't recall any real problems except "it isn't the licence we
> > want it to be".
> >
> I was not aware that OpenSSL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> As far as I can tell, the problems are invented rather than real. At
> least I can't recall any real problems except "it isn't the licence we
> want it to be".
>
I was not aware that OpenSSL had changed to be compatible with GPL.
And I
Would you elaborate on the problems with the OpenSSL license?
> I remember you expressing such sentiments on the mozilla security list some
> months ago. But, there are problems with the OpenSSL license. And not
> enough crossplatform support. And, I'm a big believer in multiple
> independent
William Allen Simpson wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> I remember you expressing such sentiments on the mozilla security list some
> months ago. But, there are problems with the OpenSSL license.
As far as I can tell, the problems are invented rather than real. At
least I can't
ssage -
From: "Ben Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William Allen Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 4:09
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] NSS 3.1 Beta 1 Release]
> William Allen Simpson wrote:
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I remember you expressing such sentiments on the mozilla security list some
months ago. But, there are problems with the OpenSSL license. And not
enough crossplatform support. And, I'm a big believer in multiple
independent implementations.
Ben Laurie wrote:
William Allen Simpson wrote:
>
> Fallout from the early RSA release into public domain, the references
> to BSAFE have been replaced, and a bunch of stuff are GPL. Is there
> a team of folks doing independent code review?
>
> Since this is likely to show up on a lot of systems, and any bugs
> w
Fallout from the early RSA release into public domain, the references
to BSAFE have been replaced, and a bunch of stuff are GPL. Is there
a team of folks doing independent code review?
Since this is likely to show up on a lot of systems, and any bugs
will plague us for a long time, this see
12 matches
Mail list logo
