;
To: David R. Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Grant Bayley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: "Microsoft to publish details of Kerberos Authorisation Data
inWindows 2000"
>It's ev
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 05/01/00
at 11:35 AM, "David R. Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Hi,
>Because they want you to agree to their licensing terms for the
>specification, the executive summary of which would most likely be:
>"... the Specification is provided to you solely for your
Hi,
Because they want you to agree to their licensing terms for the specification,
the executive summary of which would most likely be:
"... the Specification is provided to you solely for your informational
purposes (for review as specified above) and, pursuant to this Agreement,
Microsoft does
Hi all,
I hope this hasn't been mentioned already (I unsubscribed there for a few
days while I was on holiday) but I just came across the details of
Microsoft's use of the extra fields in Kerberos in Windows 2000:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/kerberos/default.asp
The silly
