Re: [Crowbar] [barclamp-quantum] Removed vlan option from quantum networking mode selector [1/1] (#45)

It's not really a bug. It's a feature that was not completed, hence why it should be removed. Chris -Original Message- From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Vincent Untz Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 2:48 AM To: crowbar Subject: Re: [Crowbar] [barclamp-quantum] Removed vlan option from q

[Crowbar] Updated the Defect Tracking Wiki Page

Hi, I have just updated the Defect-Tracking with our latest bug list. https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/wiki/Defect-Tracking Randy Perryman Network Development Sr. Engineer Dell | Cloud and Big Data Solutions office +1 603 249 7710 mobil +1 603 321 5611 randy_perry...@dell.com

Re: [Crowbar] Is the tempest smoketest supposed to work?

Suggest using smoketest nova_dashboard instead of smoketest tempest -Original Message- From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Ralf Haferkamp Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 1:40 AM To: crowbar Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Is the tempest smoketest supposed to work? Hi, On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 02:27:1

Re: [Crowbar] [barclamp-quantum] Removed vlan option from quantum networking mode selector [1/1] (#45)

Le jeudi 13 juin 2013, à 07:04 -0500, christopher_dearb...@dell.com a écrit : > It's not really a bug. It's a feature that was not completed, hence why it > should be removed. Okay. But we can still complete it in pebbles, I think. Or is there anything blocking this? Also, do you have more deta

[Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone?

Hi, Right now, both the glance and swift barclamps have the option of deploying glance/swift without keystone support. However, as we're targetting an OpenStack cloud, I don't think we really care about these cases. Is there any objection against me removing this? Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens

[Crowbar] Fwd: Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone?

keepin' it on list... -- Forwarded message -- From: Judd Maltin Date: Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:22 PM Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone? To: Vincent Untz Sigh. I see what you mean about out-of-order keystone -> swift deployments. The u

[Crowbar] Crowbar build system update ahead

Tomorrow morning at around 8:00 AM CST I will update the crowbar build system to build on top of the Ubuntu 12.04.2 ISO for any Ubuntu 12.04 based builds. Please download the Ubuntu 12.04.2 amd64 server ISO from your favourite mirror! ___ Crowbar mailing

Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone?

Proposal policy question below.. Judd Maltin 1-917-882-1270 I have suffering to learn compassion once and once again. On Jun 13, 2013 12:56 PM, "Vincent Untz" wrote: > > Le jeudi 13 juin 2013, à 12:22 -0400, Judd Maltin a écrit : > > Sigh. > > > > I see what you mean about out-of-order keystone

Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone?

Generally, I like to focus on what we are testing and be very specific about that as a know "path to success" and then not prevent other paths unless they are known to cause harm. Not very crisp of an answer. Does that help? From: Judd Maltin [mailto:j...@newgoliath.com] Sent: Thursday, June 1

Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone?

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:51 PM, wrote: > Generally, I like to focus on what we are testing and be very specific about > that as a know "path to success" and then not prevent other paths unless > they are known to cause harm. Depends on your definition of harm. I forsee a few support pings. Not

[Crowbar] [CB2.0 Design] Conditional Default Options for Barclamps

Crowbarbarians! An interesting issue has come up: swift has different default os usernames by distro. We offer an input box to change it as desired, but the default value allows only one default option to the Barclamp author. Since we're using packages for OpenStack, usernames are determined by

Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone?

Vincent, There are scenarios when Customers install these without keystone. Swift in particular comes to mind. Thanks, Arkady -Original Message- From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Vincent Untz Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:02 AM To: crowbar Subject: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glanc

Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone?

I would love to support both optoin - but as I've inherited it, for this release, Keystone is required for the Swift Barclamp. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:06 PM, wrote: > Vincent, > There are scenarios when Customers install these without keystone. > Swift in particular comes to mind. > Thanks, >

Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone?

Required for barclamp installation. What about option for user recipe with no for keystone. -Original Message- From: Judd Maltin [mailto:j...@newgoliath.com] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:10 PM To: Kanevsky, Arkady Cc: Vincent Untz; crowbar Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support

Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keystone?

I really don't see the point. We're not upstreaming these recipes. Crowbar 2.0 will use the openstack-chef upstream recipes. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:20 PM, wrote: > Required for barclamp installation. What about option for user recipe with no > for keystone. > > > -Original Message-

Re: [Crowbar] [barclamp-quantum] Removed vlan option from quantum networking mode selector [1/1] (#45)

There's no question that it could be completed in pebbles, and the only thing blocking this from happening is people to work on it. I believe the issue is that quantum bumps heads with the vlans we use in the network barclamp, though Victor could give more details. Chris -Original Messag