Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>
> > Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > > > [Porting conversation from
> > https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/pull/195
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > > [Porting conversation from
> https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/pull/1959]
> > >
> > > gitify-meta breakage follows in case it's of u
Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > [Porting conversation from https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/pull/1959]
> >
> > gitify-meta breakage follows in case it's of use (BTW this was run
> > immediately after an rm -rf .releases)
>
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> [Porting conversation from https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/pull/1959]
>
> Victor Lowther wrote:
> > Adam Spiers wrote:
> > > On a related note, if we all agree that keeping release-specific stuff
> > > in a non-branched repo is highly confus
[Porting conversation from https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/pull/1959]
Victor Lowther wrote:
> Adam Spiers wrote:
> > On a related note, if we all agree that keeping release-specific stuff
> > in a non-branched repo is highly confusing, then I hope we can also
> > get rid of the current releases