John,
My sense on this is that gems are more for Rails extensions (parts of apps)
than a full application. While OpenCrowbar is mostly Rails, it is NOT only
Rails. There's quite a bit of extra stuff (chef, erlang, scripts, docs, etc)
that we package at the same level as the Rails app.
I fou
John Terpstra (john_terps...@dell.com) wrote:
> [Uncle] How can we move this forwards? What is the next step and who should
> drive it? How can I help?
I think the next step is addressing any objections that anyone can
come up with ;-)
[snipped]
> Ensuring that all files get copied / moved / sy
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:42 PM, wrote:
> Is it worthwhile to look at octokit and writing a dev tool replacement in
> Ruby? Octokit is the github supported Ruby toolkit for the github API.
>
>
>
> https://github.com/octokit/octokit.rb
>
I did that once. The startup overhead that using bundler a
Is it worthwhile to look at octokit and writing a dev tool replacement in Ruby?
Octokit is the github supported Ruby toolkit for the github API.
https://github.com/octokit/octokit.rb
Thanks,
dp
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Victor Lowther
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 10:49 AM
To: Adam
Adam,
The things you have brought up here are most timely. As we begin to address
the way that Crowbar2 will be packaged to facilitate the creation and
deployment of admin nodes and workloads we need to adopt a different strategy
from the Crowbar1 ISO build approach. The Crowbar project should
As requested by Victor, I'd like to start a conversation about the
idea of packaging barclamps as gems (which are then optionally
automatically wrapped in .rpms / .debs). This was first proposed a
*long* time ago by James Tan, and has occasionally surfaced in
conversations since then, but other th
Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > > > Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > > > This is intended t
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > > Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > > This is intended to work as a starting point for a discussion of
> what tool
Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > This is intended to work as a starting point for a discussion of what tool
> > > we should use to use to track inter-repository dependenc
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > This is intended to work as a starting point for a discussion of what
> tool
> > we should use to use to track inter-repository dependencies for CB2.0 in
> > the opencrowbar org.
>
> Before e
Victor Lowther (victor.lowt...@gmail.com) wrote:
> This is intended to work as a starting point for a discussion of what tool
> we should use to use to track inter-repository dependencies for CB2.0 in
> the opencrowbar org.
Before evaluating the tools I think it would be worth trying to
clarify th
11 matches
Mail list logo
