Your Admin node needs a public IP allocated to it.
On Jun 14, 2013 3:23 PM, wrote:
> On virtual box, running the smoketest script explicitly (from
> /opt/dell/bin/smoketest) gives me a failure at nova tests. Nova deploys
> successfully, but test does not pass. Pull request 71 (nova_dashboard) a
On virtual box, running the smoketest script explicitly (from
/opt/dell/bin/smoketest) gives me a failure at nova tests. Nova deploys
successfully, but test does not pass. Pull request 71 (nova_dashboard) and 37
(quantum) are in my code, as well as the one-line quantum recipe fix for nova.
Wa
OK, this change has been made. The next bull of the build system will
cause the Crowbar build system to stage any Ubuntu 12.04 builds on Ubuntu
12.04.2.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Victor Lowther
wrote:
> Tomorrow morning at around 8:00 AM CST I will update the crowbar build
> system to b
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:37:02AM -0500, arkady_kanev...@dell.com wrote:
> Definitely, true for community branch.
> +1 of documenting known issues both in code and on wiki (or whatever is
> appropriate place)
Instead of documenting this I would prefer if the glance barclamp did not
silently chan
Definitely, true for community branch.
+1 of documenting known issues both in code and on wiki (or whatever is
appropriate place)
From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Judd Maltin
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 7:40 AM
To: crowbar
Subject: Re: [Crowbar] Do we want to support glance & swift without keys
Le vendredi 14 juin 2013, à 08:55 -0400, Judd Maltin a écrit :
> > I'm not sure how we can deploy things out of order, when there is a real
> > dependency: for instance, it's hard to deploy keystone before the
> > database. So this means that this would only "work" for some cases, and
> > break in
> I'm not sure how we can deploy things out of order, when there is a real
> dependency: for instance, it's hard to deploy keystone before the
> database. So this means that this would only "work" for some cases, and
> break in many other cases, which breaks the principle of least surprise.
>
> And
Le jeudi 13 juin 2013, à 13:08 -0400, Judd Maltin a écrit :
> On Jun 13, 2013 12:56 PM, "Vincent Untz" wrote:
> >
> > Le jeudi 13 juin 2013, à 12:22 -0400, Judd Maltin a écrit :
> > > Sigh.
> > >
> > > I see what you mean about out-of-order keystone -> swift deployments.
> > > The user would have
On Jun 14, 2013 8:35 AM, "Vincent Untz" wrote:
>
> Le jeudi 13 juin 2013, à 13:58 -0400, Judd Maltin a écrit :
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:51 PM, wrote:
> > > Generally, I like to focus on what we are testing and be very
specific about
> > > that as a know "path to success" and then not preven
Le jeudi 13 juin 2013, à 13:58 -0400, Judd Maltin a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:51 PM, wrote:
> > Generally, I like to focus on what we are testing and be very specific about
> > that as a know "path to success" and then not prevent other paths unless
> > they are known to cause harm.
>
All,
Last Tuesday we had a discussion on OpenStack HA, I committed to share the
document and have got a bit delayed in doing that, I will convert it and add it
to the wiki - first page is here
https://github.com/crowbar/crowbar/wiki/Openstack-High-Availability
I will post out to all when done,
11 matches
Mail list logo
