On 02/08/2023 00:11, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 2023-08-01 06:28, Pádraig Brady wrote:
perhaps we can now use %j, %t, and %z now?
I hope so, particularly as we haven't seen any issues with Coreutils 9.1
or later.
I haven't run into problems using these printf formats for a while.
Gnulib doc is amb
On 2023-08-01 06:28, Pádraig Brady wrote:
perhaps we can now use %j, %t, and %z now?
I hope so, particularly as we haven't seen any issues with Coreutils 9.1
or later.
I haven't run into problems using these printf formats for a while.
Gnulib doc is ambiguous, but suggests it could be an is
%t is C99
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
On 01/08/2023 14:07, Pádraig Brady wrote:
* cfg.mk (sc_prohibit-c11-printf-format): Renamed and updated
from sc_prohibit-c99-printf-format.
* src/dd.c: Adjust %td -> %"PRIdMAX".
* src/dircolors.c: Likewise.
* src/du.c: Likewise.
* src/join.c: Likewise.
* src/od.c: Likewise.
* src/pathchk.c: Likew
