[coreboot] Documentation update

Hi everyone, Is there any chance to get this trivial commit merged? https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45829 I've added description of missing payloads and links to Documentation/payloads.md Low priority, but would be nice to have. Thanks

[coreboot] Re: libpayload CBFS API deprecation; please port payloads to new API

old API for the release after next, i.e. 4.18 around the end of this year. No objections on our part, the new API works great! So I guess only FILO remained. Cheers, bzt On 05/04/2022, Julius Werner wrote: > The libpayload CBFS stack ("libcbfs") has recently been rewritten from > sc

[coreboot] Question about PR

nly. I guess now I should add a reviewer, but how and who? Or how can I get a "Push" right? Thanks for your help, bzt ___ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org

[coreboot] Re: Question about PR

anything else. I'm really sorry for these questions and the extra PR! I looked for a delete button or something but couldn't find any. Cheers, bzt On 9/17/20, Angel Pons wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 2:50 PM Michal Zygowski > wrote: >> >> Hi, >>

[coreboot] Re: Question about PR

Thank you! Good to know! I think the problem was I never edit the commit message. I always use "-m" because I'm more of a command line guy. I'll change my habit! Sorry again about the accidental extra PR. Cheers, bzt On 9/18/20, Peter Stuge wrote: > bzt wrote: &

[coreboot] Re: System gcc requirements

oot submodule is cloned, then coreboot and cbfstool would be automatically compiled with support for it (without a Kconfig option). But for people who just clone the base repo, there would be no compilation errors. Everybody happy, problem solved. IMHO, bzt On 11/17/20, Julius Werner wrote: >

[coreboot] Re: Undepend on vboot [was: System gcc requirements]

e straightforward to solve. Forcing vboot on users is not the right answer, imho. Integrating vboot with proper ifdef guards is. But that's just my two cents. Have a nice day, bzt On 11/18/20, Patrick Georgi via coreboot wrote: > Am Di., 17. Nov. 2020 um 18:54 Uhr schrieb Peter Stuge : >

[coreboot] Re: Undepend on vboot [was: System gcc requirements]

ore complicated to maintain vboot integration than having a dependency-free cbfstool. I'm staring to have a feeling this isn't a technical issue but a political one, which I don't want to participate in. There are simple and easy solutions. I've recommended some, take it or le