[coreboot] Re: [Building] Latest Coreboot crossgcc x86_64 builds fails under ArchLinux x86_64

2022-03-14 Thread Karl Semich
Hi I'm new to coreboot and visiting briefly, I'm replying to this error because it looks like a systems error rather than a coreboot error, at first glance. "permission denied" during any build of anything is usually from accidentally running part of the build under "sudo", and fixed with (sudo ch

[coreboot] Re: [Building] Latest Coreboot crossgcc x86_64 builds fails under ArchLinux x86_64

2022-03-17 Thread Karl Semich
> > cp -p ../../gcc-11.2.0/gcc/ada/sinfo.ads > ../../gcc-11.2.0/gcc/ada/sinfo.adb ../../gcc-11.2.0/gcc/ada/xsinfo.adb > ../../gcc-11.2.0/gcc/ada/csinfo.adb ada/bldtools/sinfo > make[2]: cp: Permission denied > make[2]: *** [../../gcc-11.2.0/gcc/ada/Make-generated.in:44: > ada/sinfo.h] Error 127 >

[coreboot] Re: [Building] Latest Coreboot crossgcc x86_64 builds fails under ArchLinux x86_64

2022-03-18 Thread Karl Semich
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022, 10:56 AM Lahfa Samy wrote: > Hey so here is what I found out about the error and solved it, it was > actually making this error because the folder named 'cp' exists, as soon > as I renamed the folder 'cp' to something else, the build got working > again. > > Very weird issue

[coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC

2022-04-12 Thread Karl Semich
Obviously a way to sidestep all this would be to simply test the board in question, which is a small investment of money and time. It's sad that automated testing appears to no longer be ongoing. I might wonder whether coreboot sponsors would support a coreboot-associated automated test lab. The

[coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC

2022-04-13 Thread Karl Semich
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 6:26 AM Patrick Georgi wrote: > Am 12.04.2022 um 23:54 schrieb Karl Semich: > > Obviously a way to sidestep all this would be to simply test the board > > in question, which is a small investment of money and time. > I appreciate that you volunteer to

[coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC

2022-04-13 Thread Karl Semich
The documentation for this board was removed in 184d5d04296 . ___ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org

[coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC

2022-04-14 Thread Karl Semich
Hi Martin, > I think we all agree that it'd be good to have test racks that have all > of the boards in the coreboot repository for verification, however that's > currently not practical with the resources we have. The whole thing just > isn't a simple problem to solve. > Often the biggest impe

[coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC

2022-04-14 Thread Karl Semich
I'm sending an email directly to the board committer since nobody has mentioned the history and is responding to my idea a lot. Lee, do you still have your quark galileo board? Are you at all able to test a new build or package equipment to mail to a volunteer? On Thu, Apr 14, 2022, 4:13 PM ron

[coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC

2022-04-15 Thread Karl Semich
> > > In round numbers, coreboot is at about 5k commits/year (last time I > looked; maybe it's higher or lower now). Assuming each CL takes > around ten builds, that's 50,000 builds, times 350 boards, which > translates to "a lot." It keeps Martin's house warm, I suspect. That's > not counting the

[coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC

2022-04-22 Thread Karl Semich
> > We are deprecating ALL boards on oreboot that need FSP, as we took the > decision a few weeks ago to drop boards > that require blobs on the main CPU (we're accepting PSP blobs for now) > Just a quick note that our society basically has the technology to automatically reimplement binary blobs

[coreboot] Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC

2022-04-23 Thread Karl Semich
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022, 11:40 AM ron minnich wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 11:59 PM Karl Semich <0xl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> We are deprecating ALL boards on oreboot that need FSP, as we took the > >> decision a few weeks ago to drop boards > >&

[coreboot] Automated Engineering Notes was Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC

2022-05-02 Thread Karl Semich
C To: Karl Semich <0xl...@gmail.com> I'm very interested in your ideas. Yep, I"m interested, I've been trying to find someone interested in this for 5 years now -- Forwarded message - Date: Sun, Apr 24, 2022, 10:32 AM Subject: Re: [coreboot] Re: Deprecation

[coreboot] Re: Automated Engineering Notes was Re: Deprecation of the Intel Quark SoC

2022-06-18 Thread Karl Semich
This model removes the need for expanding the input length. I believe it can be trained to operate on input and output lengths limited only by available data: https://github.com/BlinkDL/RWKV-LM ___ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubsc

[coreboot] Re: POST codes and PCI Post card

2022-07-11 Thread Karl Semich
I didn't have a post card, and ended up writing an early-boot serial byte writer, to see the post codes via. After doing this they were quite useful. Later I was forwarded to SerialICE which has already implemented such a writer. ___ coreboot mailing list

[coreboot] Re: Intel Quark - a quick update

2022-07-19 Thread Karl Semich
Since I was involved in stimulating this thread, I'm commenting that I only asked for and heard that Andy was going to test the existing code, under the assumption it is not extensively burdensome to do so. I understand that whether or not the board still works is a factor in some people's views