[coreboot] Re: 2023-08-23 - coreboot Leadership meeting minutes

Hello Hannah, Williams, Hannah wrote: > Already there are binaries FSP, AGESA, PSP being used in Coreboot We consider this historical problems in the coreboot project and it is absolutely not something we intend to lean into. Since you have a mandate to work with coreboot I guess you are onboard

[coreboot] Patches moved to main branch lost review scores

Hi, Most of my gerrit patches moved to the main branch over the week-end. But they lost reviews score such +2 or V+1. Typically, . If V+1 is mandatory how do I trigger the Jenkins gerrit build ? Regards, -- *Jeremy* /One Emacs to rule them all/ __

[coreboot] RFC: Post-build control of serial console

Hi, RFC: Post-build control of serial console It is annoying to have to create and maintain two completely different builds of coreboot just to enable or disable the console. It would be much more convenient to have a 'silent' flag in the image, which can be updated as needed, without needing to

[coreboot] Re: 2023-08-23 - coreboot Leadership meeting minutes

While it is true that there are binary blobs in coreboot today, that was not always the case. From 1999 to about 2011, all coreboot images were built from 100% source code, most of it GPL, some of it BSD-style license (e.g. microcode). Around 2006, Intel made it impossible to continue with open s

[coreboot] Re: RFC: Post-build control of serial console

Hi Simon I agree that both cbfs or fmap for that matter are not practical options as on some SOC the boot memory is not memory mapped and requires some hardware init. We have other instances where cbfstool updates the bootblock code post compilation: cbfs verification. See src/lib/metadata_hash.