Issue #432 has been updated by Angel Pons.
Affected hardware changed from Lenovo t440p to Lenovo ThinkPad T440p
Status changed from New to Response Needed
Hi, osboot is not the same as coreboot. Have you asked the people responsible
for osboot to provide support?
It would be great if you could
Issue #432 has been updated by Angel Pons.
Hmmm, looks like the issue happens because the MRC cache
Bug #432: t440p reboots on suspend
https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/432#change-1215
* Author: Josh R
* Status: Response Needed
* Priority: Normal
* Tar
Issue #432 has been updated by Angel Pons.
*sigh* where is the "Edit" button?
Looks like the issue happens because something is messed up with the "ROM
size"...
```
flash size 0x280 bytes
SF: Detected 00 with sector size 0x1000, total 0x280
SF size 0x280 does not correspond to
Issue #421 has been updated by Krystian Hebel.
> I don't know what skiboot is... is that coreboot? Do they have a real use
> case for having both hashes in the log or is it just another bootloader where
> someone decided "might as well write all the hashes in advance just because
> the spec te
Issue #432 has been updated by Angel Pons.
File osboot_t440p_ifd_bin_is_also_borked.log added
Yes, it's definitely an osboot problem... Please report the issue to osboot
folks, and point them to this ticket.
After grabbing the T440p IFD.bin that osboot uses and using `util/ifdtool`'s
`-d` opti
Issue #432 has been updated by Josh R.
Angel Pons wrote in #note-4:
> Yes, it's definitely an osboot problem... Please report the issue to osboot
> folks, and point them to this ticket.
>
> After grabbing the T440p IFD.bin that osboot uses and using `util/ifdtool`'s
> `-d` option on it (af
Issue #421 has been updated by Julius Werner.
> However, instead of following existing standards, be it TCG or coreboot, such
> approach creates yet another one. Having the ability to use more than one
> would make transition to TPM2.0 easier, if not no-op. Since we are going to
> have to chan
7 matches
Mail list logo
