[coreboot] Re: Intel Quark - a quick update

Ron wrote… >so how's it going? Slowly! The day job has got in the way a bit but I have been struggling to build the FSP binaries based on the instructions at [1]. I’m not sure whether that is down to me not fully understanding the instructions (always possible) or whether there is work-in-prog

[coreboot] Re: Intel Quark - a quick update

Hi Andy, On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 2:19 PM Andy Pont wrote: > > Ron wrote… > > >so how's it going? > Slowly! The day job has got in the way a bit but I have been struggling > to build the FSP binaries based on the instructions at [1]. I’m not > sure whether that is down to me not fully understandi

[coreboot] Re: Intel Quark - a quick update

Do we have criteria on which to decide if quark is worth keeping? Is there a deadline for the work? At some point, you're going to find code changing out from under you; are you committing to be the maintainer? On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 7:45 AM Angel Pons wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > On Tue, Jul 19, 202

[coreboot] Intel sandybridge northbridge with ibexpeak southbridge?

Hello, I have a platform (Advantech NAMB-3250MB, used in some Riverbed appliances) which uses Sandy/Ivy Bridge CPUs, but has a DH89xxCC southbridge which according to ifdtool is Ibex Peak. [3] The ME firmware version from the vendor firmware is 6.0.50.1244 which also corresponds to Ibex Peak (Ser

[coreboot] Re: Intel Quark - a quick update

Since I was involved in stimulating this thread, I'm commenting that I only asked for and heard that Andy was going to test the existing code, under the assumption it is not extensively burdensome to do so. I understand that whether or not the board still works is a factor in some people's views