[coreboot] Re: How to maintain AGESA-based ports long-term?

2021-11-29 Thread awokd via coreboot
Nico Huber: I'll list some thoughts what could be done. Feel free to agree to or dismiss any of it. Some things are mutually exclusive, others are not. Thank you for the well written summary. Have been asking myself some of the same questions. Lack the experience to make a recommendation for

[coreboot] Re: How to maintain AGESA-based ports long-term?

2021-11-29 Thread awokd via coreboot
Nico Huber: On 29.11.21 14:49, awokd wrote: Branching - I know some people are easily offended by the thought, but I want to mention it anyway as it seems to me like a cheap solution for the com- munity as a whole. We could maintain platforms on separate branches. Is this different th

[coreboot] Re: How to maintain AGESA-based ports long-term?

2021-11-29 Thread Nico Huber
On 29.11.21 14:49, awokd wrote: >> >> Branching >> - >> I know some people are easily offended by the thought, but I want to >> mention it anyway as it seems to me like a cheap solution for the com- >> munity as a whole. We could maintain platforms on separate branches. > > Is this differen

[coreboot] Re: How to maintain AGESA-based ports long-term?

2021-11-29 Thread Nico Huber
On 29.11.21 15:58, awokd wrote: > Nico Huber: >> On 29.11.21 14:49, awokd wrote: Branching - I know some people are easily offended by the thought, but I want to mention it anyway as it seems to me like a cheap solution for the com- munity as a whole. We could

[coreboot] Re: Suggestion for deprecation: LEGACY_SMP_INIT & RESOURCE_ALLOCATOR_V3

2021-11-29 Thread Branden Waldner
I wasn't really sure that I wanted to comment on this, but seeing as how I have some of the affected boards I guess I should. Angel Pons wrote: > Besides AMD AGESA boards, the other boards that need to be updated are AOpen > DXPL > Plus-U (a dual-socket server board that uses Netburst Xeons, no