[coreboot] Coreboot on newer hardware after some hardware mods?

2021-04-12 Thread maxime.corne--- via coreboot
Hello everyone, I know this question had been asked many times, but is it possible to have Coreboot on modern hardware? After looking at a video ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt3bXZXsrE4](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt3bXZXsrE4&t=1s)) I learned that some people were able to put coreboot

[coreboot] Re: HP compaq 8200 compatability

2021-04-12 Thread Peter Stuge
ppbruhuwu--- via coreboot wrote: > Hello so i was talking to my friend about coreboot but i saw that > only the SFF version of the compaq 8200 was compatible and so i > wanted to know why that is? Those adding that code were only interested in supporting that model. > Also will coreboot be availa

[coreboot] Re: HP compaq 8200 compatability

2021-04-12 Thread Angel Pons
Hi Peter, list, On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:06 PM Peter Stuge wrote: > > ppbruhuwu--- via coreboot wrote: > > Hello so i was talking to my friend about coreboot but i saw that > > only the SFF version of the compaq 8200 was compatible and so i > > wanted to know why that is? > > Those adding that

[coreboot] Re: Coreboot on newer hardware after some hardware mods?

2021-04-12 Thread Peter Stuge
maxime.corne--- via coreboot wrote: > I know this question had been asked many times, but is it possible > to have Coreboot on modern hardware? The general answer is yes, it is possible under certain conditions. What those conditions are depends both on the particular hardware platform (CPU+chips

[coreboot] Re: Coreboot on newer hardware after some hardware mods?

2021-04-12 Thread Nico Huber
Am 12.04.21 um 14:33 schrieb Peter Stuge: maxime.corne--- via coreboot wrote: After some research on the Internet, I found out coreboot couldn’t be port to modern hardware because of an Intel technology which encrypt the bios (I might be wrong, if so, sorry). Encryption (signatures actually, n

[coreboot] Re: Coreboot on newer hardware after some hardware mods?

2021-04-12 Thread Peter Stuge
Nico Huber wrote: > > if the system integrator has enabled BootGuard in the > > "wrong" way then the signature verification is intended to make it > > impossible to install coreboot onto the system. > > This seems a bit misleading. BootGuard is independent of the flash > chip and write access to i