ron minnich wrote:
> At some point, you're going to find code changing out from under you;
I find that obnoxious.
I understand that you Ron are *not* saying that *you* will change
code from under Andy but I find the embracing/accepting of non-
compatibility and lack of longevity toxic.
I am not
Since I was involved in stimulating this thread, I'm commenting that I
only asked for and heard that Andy was going to test the existing code,
under the assumption it is not extensively burdensome to do so.
I understand that whether or not the board still works is a factor in some
people's views
Do we have criteria on which to decide if quark is worth keeping? Is
there a deadline for the work? At some point, you're going to find
code changing out from under you; are you committing to be the
maintainer?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 7:45 AM Angel Pons wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 202
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 2:19 PM Andy Pont wrote:
>
> Ron wrote…
>
> >so how's it going?
> Slowly! The day job has got in the way a bit but I have been struggling
> to build the FSP binaries based on the instructions at [1]. I’m not
> sure whether that is down to me not fully understandi
Ron wrote…
>so how's it going?
Slowly! The day job has got in the way a bit but I have been struggling
to build the FSP binaries based on the instructions at [1]. I’m not
sure whether that is down to me not fully understanding the instructions
(always possible) or whether there is work-in-prog
so how's it going?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 8:41 AM Martin Roth via coreboot
wrote:
>
> Thanks Andy, I think that's totally reasonable.
> Martin
>
> Apr 26, 2022, 06:56 by andy.p...@sdcsystems.com:
>
> > Felix wrote...
> >
> > >So, will you also step up as a maintainer for it?
> > I’m going to res
Thanks Andy, I think that's totally reasonable.
Martin
Apr 26, 2022, 06:56 by andy.p...@sdcsystems.com:
> Felix wrote...
>
> >So, will you also step up as a maintainer for it?
> I’m going to reserve judgement on that until I see how things go with
> trying to get the existing coreboot code runni
Felix wrote...
>So, will you also step up as a maintainer for it?
I’m going to reserve judgement on that until I see how things go with
trying to get the existing coreboot code running on the boards. The Gen
1 should be here tomorrow (I think).
-Andy.
__
On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 08:22 +, Andy Pont wrote:
> Thanks to the generosity of members of the list there are two Intel
> Galileo boards, a Gen 1 and Gen 2, on their way to me which should
> arrive towards the end of the month.
>
> As soon as they get here I will start testing the various conf
Andy Pont wrote:
> As soon as they get here I will start testing the various configs
> to see what works and what is broken.
Many thanks to you and everyone who helped make this happen!
//Peter
___
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsu
10 matches
Mail list logo
