Re: RFR: 8360411: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java Refactor extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic

2025-07-09 Thread Darragh Conway
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 16:34:47 GMT, Mikhail Yankelevich wrote: >> Refactored extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic > > test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java line 200: > >> 198: String name = fileName; >> 199: while (name.length() < MAX_LENGTH) { >> 20

RFR: 8360411: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java Refactor extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic

2025-07-09 Thread Darragh Conway
Refactored extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic - Commit messages: - 8360411:[TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java Refactor extract method to encapsulate Windows specific Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26193/files Webrev: https://web

Re: RFR: 8360411: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java Refactor extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic

2025-07-14 Thread Darragh Conway
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 16:10:17 GMT, Darragh Conway wrote: > Refactored extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic Thanks for the suggestion, I'll create a separate ticket for that junit conversion... - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26193#issu

RFR: 8363720: Follow up to JDK-8360411 with post review comments

2025-07-23 Thread Darragh Conway
There were a couple of post review comments after the /integrate command was submitted. This issue will address those comments. Also created constants for hardcoded values and tests. Fixed some typos. - Commit messages: - 8363720: Follow up to JDK-8360411 with post review comments

Re: RFR: 8360411: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java Refactor extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic

2025-07-22 Thread Darragh Conway
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 16:10:17 GMT, Darragh Conway wrote: > Refactored extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic @AlanBateman thanks for the comments I'll address those in the following issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8363720 if that's ok with you. As I&#x

Integrated: 8363720: Follow up to JDK-8360411 with post review comments

2025-08-03 Thread Darragh Conway
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:07:25 GMT, Darragh Conway wrote: > There were a couple of post review comments for PR: > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/26193 after the /integrate command was > submitted. This issue will address those comments. Also created constants for > hardcode

Re: RFR: 8363720: Follow up to JDK-8360411 with post review comments [v5]

2025-07-31 Thread Darragh Conway
> There were a couple of post review comments for PR: > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/26193 after the /integrate command was > submitted. This issue will address those comments. Also created constants for > hardcoded values and tests. Fixed some typos. Darragh Conway has upda

Re: RFR: 8363720: Follow up to JDK-8360411 with post review comments [v4]

2025-07-31 Thread Darragh Conway
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 22:08:09 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> Darragh Conway has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> Implemented Brian's suggestion > > test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.jav

Re: RFR: 8363720: Follow up to JDK-8360411 with post review comments [v4]

2025-07-31 Thread Darragh Conway
> There were a couple of post review comments after the /integrate command was > submitted. This issue will address those comments. Also created constants for > hardcoded values and tests. Fixed some typos. Darragh Conway has updated the pull request incrementally with one additiona

Re: RFR: 8363720: Follow up to JDK-8360411 with post review comments [v3]

2025-07-31 Thread Darragh Conway
On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 18:48:10 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> Darragh Conway has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> Fix remaining indentation errors (From my first commit on this branch) &

Re: RFR: 8363720: Follow up to JDK-8360411 with post review comments [v4]

2025-07-31 Thread Darragh Conway
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 20:50:36 GMT, Darragh Conway wrote: >> There were a couple of post review comments after the /integrate command was >> submitted. This issue will address those comments. Also created constants >> for hardcoded values and tests. Fixed some typos. >

Integrated: 8360411: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java Refactor extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic

2025-07-22 Thread Darragh Conway
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 16:10:17 GMT, Darragh Conway wrote: > Refactored extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 016694bf Author:DarraghConway Committer: Mark Sheppard URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/com

Re: RFR: 8363720: Follow up to JDK-8360411 with post review comments [v3]

2025-07-24 Thread Darragh Conway
> There were a couple of post review comments after the /integrate command was > submitted. This issue will address those comments. Also created constants for > hardcoded values and tests. Fixed some typos. Darragh Conway has updated the pull request incrementally with one additiona

Re: RFR: 8363720: Follow up to JDK-8360411 with post review comments [v2]

2025-07-24 Thread Darragh Conway
> There were a couple of post review comments after the /integrate command was > submitted. This issue will address those comments. Also created constants for > hardcoded values and tests. Fixed some typos. Darragh Conway has updated the pull request incrementally with one additiona