On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:53:57 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Two (since 19) usages of Unsafe.getAndAddInt to update a static field provide
> the Class object as the base instead of the base object returned by
> Unsafe.staticFieldBase. This doesn't change anything on the HotSpot VM.
LGTM, thank you!
The change in [JDK-8283415](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8283415) made
use of the now available `sealed` keyword for `FinalReference`.
Unfortunately this introduced a problem for the Espresso VM (Java on Truffle):
Since Espresso is written in Java it uses the functionality of the "Host VM
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 17:40:49 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> The change in [JDK-8283415](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8283415)
>> made use of the now available `sealed` keyword for `FinalReference`.
>>
>> Unfortunately this introduced a problem for the Espresso VM (Java on
>> Truffle): Since
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 14:17:24 GMT, Bernhard Urban-Forster
wrote:
> The change in [JDK-8283415](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8283415) made
> use of the now available `sealed` keyword for `FinalReference`.
>
> Unfortunately this introduced a problem for the Espresso VM (Java o