On 12/12/22 7:26 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/12/2022 18:15, Matej Turcel wrote:
:
So far, jdeps with the --api-only flag seems like the perfect tool,
except
there is a little problem -- we have packages (dozens of them) which
exist in multiple modules. For example, package `com.foo` exist
On 12.12.2022 16:26, Alan Bateman wrote:
The scenario seems a bit unusual in that API elements with package
access aren't usually considered to be part of the API.
Yes, they shouldn't be. But our code is not perfect and we have many
cases where package-private elements de-facto are a part of t
On 03/12/2022 18:15, Matej Turcel wrote:
:
So far, jdeps with the --api-only flag seems like the perfect tool,
except
there is a little problem -- we have packages (dozens of them) which
exist in multiple modules. For example, package `com.foo` exists in
three separate modules (meaning each of
Hello,
I would like to propose a new option for jdeps, similar to --api-only,
which would analyze not only private and protected API (like --api-only
does), but also package-private API. In more detail, this option would
report all dependencies which occur in all types (not only public ones),
nam
