Hi Joe,
Thanks for your mail, and interest about what Apache Xalan-J team
has been able to do up to now with respect to XSLT 3.0 language
implementation.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 10:24 AM Joe Wang wrote:
> Great work. Are the tests counted differently?
Apache Xalan-J's XSLT 3.0 & XPath 3.1 test
On 3/1/25 10:19 PM, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
Hi Joe,
Thanks for nice thoughts.
On Fri, 28 Feb, 2025, 00:06 Joe Wang, wrote:
What's your assessment on the readiness for a formal release (or how
much additional work is needed)? What are the conformance test
results?
The link here,
On 02/03/2025 05:21, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
Hi Alan,
Thanks for your reply.
On Thu, 27 Feb, 2025, 13:41 Alan Bateman, wrote:
If you are interested in contributing to the XML implementations
in the java.xml module then this would be welcomed. It's always
better to start small with
Hi Joe,
Thanks for nice thoughts.
On Fri, 28 Feb, 2025, 00:06 Joe Wang, wrote:
> What's your assessment on the readiness for a formal release (or how
> much additional work is needed)? What are the conformance test results?
>
The link here, https://github.com/apache/xalan-java/tree/xalan-j_
Hi Alan,
Thanks for your reply.
On Thu, 27 Feb, 2025, 13:41 Alan Bateman, wrote:
> If you are interested in contributing to the XML implementations in the
> java.xml module then this would be welcomed. It's always better to start
> small with bug fixes, test improvements and other changes to
Hi Mukul,
Xalan-J's XSL 3 implementation has not been integrated into any Xalan
releases. I understand it implemented most of the XSLT 3.0
specification, but not all of them, esp. the Streaming feature. Was the
incompleteness the reason why it was not included in an Xalan release?
What's your
ubject: Re: adding Xalan's XSL 3 implementation within jdk
Hi Alan,
I've just seen this mail from you. Apologies for a delayed response.
My mail box has had few issues due to the volume of mails that I get
from mailing lists.
On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 9:38 PM Alan Bateman wrote:
> Th
On 26/02/2025 15:59, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
Hi Alan,
I've just seen this mail from you. Apologies for a delayed response.
My mail box has had few issues due to the volume of mails that I get
from mailing lists.
On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 9:38 PM Alan Bateman wrote:
The stats for that branch
As long as Xalan is contained in OpenJDK, it should be updated. It makes
no sense to provide XSL 1 still, but not XSL 2 or 3.
A different question is whether that means that the source code must be
copied into OpenJDK, or if it wouldn't be enough to instead bundle the
original JAR from Apache,
Hi Alan,
I've just seen this mail from you. Apologies for a delayed response.
My mail box has had few issues due to the volume of mails that I get
from mailing lists.
On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 9:38 PM Alan Bateman wrote:
> The stats for that branch suggest 5,845 changed files with 234,372 addi
On 02/02/2025 14:27, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
Hi all,
Due to an unknowing issue with the previous mail that I've sent as
mentioned within mail trail, the URL of codebase repos branch got
specified ashttps://github.com/apache/xalan-java/tree/xalan-j_xslt3.0_mvn.
(with an erroneous period suffix ch
Hi all,
Due to an unknowing issue with the previous mail that I've sent as
mentioned within mail trail, the URL of codebase repos branch got
specified as https://github.com/apache/xalan-java/tree/xalan-j_xslt3.0_mvn.
(with an erroneous period suffix character). The correct URL is
https://github
12 matches
Mail list logo
