On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 20:46:17 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> Update the documentation for `@return` tag of `putIfAbsent` to match the
>> main description. `putIfAbsent` uses the same wording as `put` for its
>> `@return` tag, but that is incorrect. `putIfAbsent` never returns the
>> **previous**
> Update the documentation for `@return` tag of `putIfAbsent` to match the main
> description. `putIfAbsent` uses the same wording as `put` for its `@return`
> tag, but that is incorrect. `putIfAbsent` never returns the **previous**
> value, as the whole point of the method is not the replace t
