Re: RFR: JDK-8297605 DelayQueue javadoc is confusing [v2]

2023-04-03 Thread Viktor Klang
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:08:57 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote: >> Clarifies the distinction between expiration of the head of DelayQueue and >> how it relates to `poll`, `take`, and `peek`. See discussion on >> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297605 >> >> @DougLea If possible, please weigh in on w

Re: RFR: JDK-8297605 DelayQueue javadoc is confusing [v2]

2023-03-02 Thread Pavel Rappo
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 11:17:10 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote: > Perhaps @pavelrappo has any suggestion for adding clarifying Javadoc to a > subclass without having to override the method? 🤔 You cannot do that. - PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12729

Re: RFR: JDK-8297605 DelayQueue javadoc is confusing [v2]

2023-03-02 Thread Viktor Klang
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:08:57 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote: >> Clarifies the distinction between expiration of the head of DelayQueue and >> how it relates to `poll`, `take`, and `peek`. See discussion on >> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297605 >> >> @DougLea If possible, please weigh in on w

Re: RFR: JDK-8297605 DelayQueue javadoc is confusing [v2]

2023-02-27 Thread Doug Lea
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 16:08:57 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote: >> Clarifies the distinction between expiration of the head of DelayQueue and >> how it relates to `poll`, `take`, and `peek`. See discussion on >> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297605 >> >> @DougLea If possible, please weigh in on w

Re: RFR: JDK-8297605 DelayQueue javadoc is confusing [v2]

2023-02-24 Thread Viktor Klang
> Clarifies the distinction between expiration of the head of DelayQueue and > how it relates to `poll`, `take`, and `peek`. See discussion on > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297605 > > @DougLea If possible, please weigh in on whether this is in line with your > thoughts on the matter.