On Wed, 14 May 2025 06:32:30 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> That seems reasonable, yes. However, I'd like to keep this change to the
> absolute minimum. Feel free to open a separate issue for fixing this.
FIled: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356937
-
PR Review Comment: ht
On Tue, 13 May 2025 00:10:50 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> A handful of html and xml files in the JDK source tree claims to have
>> encodings like `ISO-8859-1`, when they are in fact pure US-ASCII files.
>>
>> While perhaps technically correct, this is misleading, and goes contrary to
>> the
On Fri, 9 May 2025 14:14:57 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> A handful of html and xml files in the JDK source tree claims to have
> encodings like `ISO-8859-1`, when they are in fact pure US-ASCII files.
>
> While perhaps technically correct, this is misleading, and goes contrary to
> the eff
On Fri, 9 May 2025 14:14:57 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> A handful of html and xml files in the JDK source tree claims to have
> encodings like `ISO-8859-1`, when they are in fact pure US-ASCII files.
>
> While perhaps technically correct, this is misleading, and goes contrary to
> the eff
On Fri, 9 May 2025 14:14:57 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> A handful of html and xml files in the JDK source tree claims to have
> encodings like `ISO-8859-1`, when they are in fact pure US-ASCII files.
>
> While perhaps technically correct, this is misleading, and goes contrary to
> the eff
On Fri, 9 May 2025 14:14:57 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> A handful of html and xml files in the JDK source tree claims to have
> encodings like `ISO-8859-1`, when they are in fact pure US-ASCII files.
>
> While perhaps technically correct, this is misleading, and goes contrary to
> the eff
