On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 11:05:48 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
>>> > FYI: `BoolTest::negate` already does what you want: `mask negate( ) const
>>> > { return mask(_test^4); }` I think you should use that instead :)
>>>
>>> Indeed, I hadn't noticed that, thank you.
>>
>> Oh I think we still cannot use `
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 11:05:48 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
>>> > FYI: `BoolTest::negate` already does what you want: `mask negate( ) const
>>> > { return mask(_test^4); }` I think you should use that instead :)
>>>
>>> Indeed, I hadn't noticed that, thank you.
>>
>> Oh I think we still cannot use `
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 11:05:48 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
>>> > FYI: `BoolTest::negate` already does what you want: `mask negate( ) const
>>> > { return mask(_test^4); }` I think you should use that instead :)
>>>
>>> Indeed, I hadn't noticed that, thank you.
>>
>> Oh I think we still cannot use `
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 07:01:58 GMT, erifan wrote:
> > > Oh I think we still cannot use `BoolTest::negate`, because we cannot
> > > instantiate a `BoolTest` object with **unsigned** comparison.
> > > `BoolTest::negate` is a non-static function.
> >
> >
> > I see. Ok. Hmm. I still think that the l
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 11:05:48 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
> > Oh I think we still cannot use `BoolTest::negate`, because we cannot
> > instantiate a `BoolTest` object with **unsigned** comparison.
> > `BoolTest::negate` is a non-static function.
>
> I see. Ok. Hmm. I still think that the logic sho
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:48:46 GMT, erifan wrote:
> Oh I think we still cannot use `BoolTest::negate`, because we cannot
> instantiate a `BoolTest` object with **unsigned** comparison.
> `BoolTest::negate` is a non-static function.
I see. Ok. Hmm. I still think that the logic should be in `BoolTe
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:24:10 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
> FYI: `BoolTest::negate` already does what you want: `mask negate( ) const {
> return mask(_test^4); }` I think you should use that instead :)
Indeed, I hadn't noticed that, thank you.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:32:15 GMT, erifan wrote:
> > FYI: `BoolTest::negate` already does what you want: `mask negate( ) const {
> > return mask(_test^4); }` I think you should use that instead :)
>
> Indeed, I hadn't noticed that, thank you.
Oh I think we still cannot use `BoolTest::negate`, be
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:12:30 GMT, erifan wrote:
>> This patch optimizes the following patterns:
>> For integer types:
>>
>> (XorV (VectorMaskCmp src1 src2 cond) (Replicate -1))
>> => (VectorMaskCmp src1 src2 ncond)
>> (XorVMask (VectorMaskCmp src1 src2 cond) (MaskAll m1))
>> => (VectorMas
> This patch optimizes the following patterns:
> For integer types:
>
> (XorV (VectorMaskCmp src1 src2 cond) (Replicate -1))
> => (VectorMaskCmp src1 src2 ncond)
> (XorVMask (VectorMaskCmp src1 src2 cond) (MaskAll m1))
> => (VectorMaskCmp src1 src2 ncond)
>
> cond can be eq, ne, le, ge, l
10 matches
Mail list logo
