On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 16:03:08 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Those system property values on Windows were derived from Windows'
>> `GetConsoleCP()` call, but they should have been taken from
>> `GetConsoleOutputCP()`. Replacing the incorrect call with the correct one
>> won't change any behavior, as
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 16:03:08 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Those system property values on Windows were derived from Windows'
>> `GetConsoleCP()` call, but they should have been taken from
>> `GetConsoleOutputCP()`. Replacing the incorrect call with the correct one
>> won't change any behavior, as
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 16:03:08 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Those system property values on Windows were derived from Windows'
>> `GetConsoleCP()` call, but they should have been taken from
>> `GetConsoleOutputCP()`. Replacing the incorrect call with the correct one
>> won't change any behavior, as
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 16:11:47 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Handled the error case
>
> src/java.base/windows/native/libjava/java_props_md.c line 131:
>
>> 129: }
>> 130:
>> 131: s
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 16:03:08 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Those system property values on Windows were derived from Windows'
>> `GetConsoleCP()` call, but they should have been taken from
>> `GetConsoleOutputCP()`. Replacing the incorrect call with the correct one
>> won't change any behavior, as
> Those system property values on Windows were derived from Windows'
> `GetConsoleCP()` call, but they should have been taken from
> `GetConsoleOutputCP()`. Replacing the incorrect call with the correct one
> won't change any behavior, as both calls return the same value by default
> (`GetOEMCP
