On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 17:57:37 GMT, Hamlin Li wrote:
>> Robbin Ehn has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional
>> commits sinc
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:00:45 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
>> Hi, for you to consider.
>>
>> These tests constantly fails in qemu-user.
>> Either the require host to be same arch explicit or implicit (sysroot).
>> E.g. "ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ..) failed for 405157: Function not
>> implemented'" for SA
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:57:32 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
> I don't see any alternatives - if this approach is not liked, any suggestions?
The changes seems fine to me. It's just a pity that this would only work for
riscv for now.
I guess we don't have a better choice given current status of qemu-use
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:00:45 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
>> Hi, for you to consider.
>>
>> These tests constantly fails in qemu-user.
>> Either the require host to be same arch explicit or implicit (sysroot).
>> E.g. "ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ..) failed for 405157: Function not
>> implemented'" for SA
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 10:45:54 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
>> Hi, for you to consider.
>>
>> These tests constantly fails in qemu-user.
>> Either the require host to be same arch explicit or implicit (sysroot).
>> E.g. "ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ..) failed for 405157: Function not
>> implemented'" for SA
> Hi, for you to consider.
>
> These tests constantly fails in qemu-user.
> Either the require host to be same arch explicit or implicit (sysroot).
> E.g. "ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ..) failed for 405157: Function not implemented'"
> for SA tests.
>
> From bug:
>> qemu-user/rv64 sets uarch to "qemu"
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 02:13:46 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
> > qemu-user, "uarch: qemu" in cpuinfo: `[0.084s][info ][os,cpu] CPU: total 28
> > (initial active 28) qemu rv64 rvi rvm rva rvf rvd rvc rvv zba zbb zbs zfh
> > zfhmin zvbc zvfh zicond` Hence we know this is qemu-user (only qemu-user
> > sets
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 10:45:54 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
>> Hi, for you to consider.
>>
>> These tests constantly fails in qemu-user.
>> Either the require host to be same arch explicit or implicit (sysroot).
>> E.g. "ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ..) failed for 405157: Function not
>> implemented'" for SA
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 07:29:01 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
> > > > It's not some intermittently failure. The majority of them can't work
> > > > as they use pstack, open core files, use PerfData, etc.. and expected
> > > > it to be rv64. But core files, pstack are in host arch as we are
> > > > running
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 06:31:55 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
> > > It's not some intermittently failure. The majority of them can't work as
> > > they use pstack, open core files, use PerfData, etc.. and expected it to
> > > be rv64. But core files, pstack are in host arch as we are running
> > > qemu-u
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 03:57:10 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
> > It's not some intermittently failure. The majority of them can't work as
> > they use pstack, open core files, use PerfData, etc.. and expected it to be
> > rv64. But core files, pstack are in host arch as we are running qemu-user.
> > I can
On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 06:53:15 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
> It's not some intermittently failure. The majority of them can't work as they
> use pstack, open core files, use PerfData, etc.. and expected it to be rv64.
> But core files, pstack are in host arch as we are running qemu-user. I can
> remo
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 10:45:54 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
>> Hi, for you to consider.
>>
>> These tests constantly fails in qemu-user.
>> Either the require host to be same arch explicit or implicit (sysroot).
>> E.g. "ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ..) failed for 405157: Function not
>> implemented'" for SA
> Hi, for you to consider.
>
> These tests constantly fails in qemu-user.
> Either the require host to be same arch or they are very very slow in
> emulation.
> E.g. "ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ..) failed for 405157: Function not implemented'"
> for SA tests.
> This is the initial set of tests, there
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 17:57:37 GMT, Hamlin Li wrote:
> I also feel annoying to see some tests fail interminently.
>
> Not sure if I understand the goal of this pr, seems it might not be the best
> solution to simply disable these tests when running with qemu. My concerns
> are: qemu is still one
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 14:32:18 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
>> Hi, for you to consider.
>>
>> These tests constantly fails in qemu-user.
>> Either the require host to be same arch or they are very very slow in
>> emulation.
>> E.g. "ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ..) failed for 405157: Function not
>> implemen
> Hi, for you to consider.
>
> These tests constantly fails in qemu-user.
> Either the require host to be same arch or they are very very slow in
> emulation.
> E.g. "ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ..) failed for 405157: Function not implemented'"
> for SA tests.
> This is the initial set of tests, there
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:20:19 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> > One issue with high timeout factor is that make+jtreg only can parallelize
> > tests in the same directory. Which means you often end up with just waiting
> > for one test to complete before anything else can happen.
>
> jtreg doesn't r
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:21:31 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
> One issue with high timeout factor is that make+jtreg only can parallelize
> tests in the same directory. Which means you often end up with just waiting
> for one test to complete before anything else can happen.
jtreg doesn't require tests
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 14:19:55 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
> Hi, for you to consider.
>
> These tests constantly fails in qemu-user.
> Either the require host to be same arch or they are very very slow in
> emulation.
> E.g. "ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ..) failed for 405157: Function not implemented'"
> f
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 14:19:55 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
> Hi, for you to consider.
>
> These tests constantly fails in qemu-user.
> Either the require host to be same arch or they are very very slow in
> emulation.
> E.g. "ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ..) failed for 405157: Function not implemented'"
> f
21 matches
Mail list logo
