Re: RFR: 8350075: Performance difference between SegmentAllocator methods [v2]

2025-04-14 Thread Per Minborg
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 06:00:48 GMT, Per Minborg wrote: >> This PR proposes to add `@ForceInline` to the `default` methods in >> `SegmentAllocator` that do not already have it. > > Per Minborg has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev

Re: RFR: 8350075: Performance difference between SegmentAllocator methods [v2]

2025-04-10 Thread Maurizio Cimadamore
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 06:00:48 GMT, Per Minborg wrote: >> This PR proposes to add `@ForceInline` to the `default` methods in >> `SegmentAllocator` that do not already have it. > > Per Minborg has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev

Re: RFR: 8350075: Performance difference between SegmentAllocator methods [v2]

2025-04-09 Thread Per Minborg
> This PR proposes to add `@ForceInline` to the `default` methods in > `SegmentAllocator` that do not already have it. Per Minborg has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase