On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 13:32:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> The thread-per-task-executor returned by
> Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor will terminate without waiting for
> threads that are still executing cancelled tasks. This is different to
> ThreadPoolExecutor and ForkJoinPool that wa
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:29:32 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/util/concurrent/ThreadPerTaskExecutor/ThreadPerTaskExecutorTest.java
>> line 306:
>>
>>> 304: stop.await();
>>> 305: return null;
>>> 306: });
>>
>> One (additional?) option would be to obtai
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 13:32:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> The thread-per-task-executor returned by
> Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor will terminate without waiting for
> threads that are still executing cancelled tasks. This is different to
> ThreadPoolExecutor and ForkJoinPool that wa
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:16:44 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> The thread-per-task-executor returned by
>> Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor will terminate without waiting for
>> threads that are still executing cancelled tasks. This is different to
>> ThreadPoolExecutor and ForkJoinPool tha
