On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:11:22 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> When the static launcher was introduced in
>> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
>> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
>> the Windows port compiled
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 21:52:10 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix comment
>
> src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/awt_Mlib.cpp line 53:
>
>> 51: */
>> 52:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 22:10:29 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix comment
>
> src/hotspot/os/windows/os_windows.cpp line 316:
>
>> 314: }
>> 315:
>> 316: //
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:05:53 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/awt_Mlib.cpp line 53:
>>
>>> 51: */
>>> 52: if (JVM_IsStaticallyLinked()) {
>>> 53: hDLL = ::GetModuleHandle(NULL);
>>
>> So this returns a handle to the pr
> When the static launcher was introduced in
> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
> the Windows port compiled but did not work. Now the time has come to fix that.
>
> Most of
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 21:48:27 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> When the static launcher was introduced in
>> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
>> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
>> the Windows port compiled but did n
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:41:51 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> When the static launcher was introduced in
> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
> the Windows port compiled but
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:41:51 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> When the static launcher was introduced in
> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
> the Windows port compiled but
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:41:51 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> When the static launcher was introduced in
> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
> the Windows port compiled but
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:41:51 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> When the static launcher was introduced in
> [JDK-8339480](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339480), due to time and
> resource constraints, it was only working properly on Linux and macOS, while
> the Windows port compiled but
10 matches
Mail list logo
