On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:09:57 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> The performance of the `MemorySegment::fil` can be improved by replacing the
>> `checkAccess()` method call with calling `checkReadOnly()` instead (as the
>> bounds of the segment itself do not need to be checked).
>>
>> Also, smaller seg
On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:09:57 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> The performance of the `MemorySegment::fil` can be improved by replacing the
>> `checkAccess()` method call with calling `checkReadOnly()` instead (as the
>> bounds of the segment itself do not need to be checked).
>>
>> Also, smaller seg
> The performance of the `MemorySegment::fil` can be improved by replacing the
> `checkAccess()` method call with calling `checkReadOnly()` instead (as the
> bounds of the segment itself do not need to be checked).
>
> Also, smaller segments can be handled directly by Java code rather than
> tr
