On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 13:10:41 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> > If the number of parameters is greater than 2, the probability of reuse may
> > not be high. Using hard-coded constants can avoid the use of forceinline.
>
> I think this entirely depends on the application. Too low a threshold and
>
On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 12:12:42 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> This is a follow-up to PR #20273, which improves performance when the number
>> of parameters exceeds 20.
>>
>> When the number of parameters is large, the possibility of reuse will be
>> lower, so we can use the static concat method and
On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 12:54:08 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
> If the number of parameters is greater than 2, the probability of reuse may
> not be high. Using hard-coded constants can avoid the use of forceinline.
I think this entirely depends on the application. Too low a threshold and many
applicat
On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 12:12:42 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> This is a follow-up to PR #20273, which improves performance when the number
>> of parameters exceeds 20.
>>
>> When the number of parameters is large, the possibility of reuse will be
>> lower, so we can use the static concat method and
> This is a follow-up to PR #20273, which improves performance when the number
> of parameters exceeds 20.
>
> When the number of parameters is large, the possibility of reuse will be
> lower, so we can use the static concat method and write the length and coder
> directly into the bytecode to
