Re: RFR: 8335366: Improve String.format performance with fastpath [v7]

2024-06-30 Thread David Schlosnagle
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 04:54:35 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote: >> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was >> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its >> performance is not good enough. >> >> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatte

Re: RFR: 8335366: Improve String.format performance with fastpath [v7]

2024-06-30 Thread David Schlosnagle
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 14:57:26 GMT, David Schlosnagle wrote: >> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> laze init for `decimal fast path locale` > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StringFormat.java line 142: > >

Re: RFR: 8335366: Improve String.format performance with fastpath [v7]

2024-06-30 Thread Shaojin Wen
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 04:54:35 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote: >> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was >> once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its >> performance is not good enough. >> >> This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatte

Re: RFR: 8335366: Improve String.format performance with fastpath [v7]

2024-06-29 Thread Shaojin Wen
> We need a String format solution with good performance. String Template was > once expected, but it has been removed. j.u.Formatter is powerful, but its > performance is not good enough. > > This PR implements a subset of j.u.Formatter capabilities. The performance is > good enough that it is