Re: RFR: 8334708: FFM: two javadoc problems

2024-06-21 Thread Maurizio Cimadamore
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:40:31 GMT, Hannes Greule wrote: > Addresses two simple problems regarding javadocs in the FFM API. Yes, javadoc fixes such as this can be backported. Just use the `/backport` command: https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/SKARA/Pull+Request+Commands#PullRequestCommands-/backp

Re: RFR: 8334708: FFM: two javadoc problems

2024-06-21 Thread Chen Liang
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:40:31 GMT, Hannes Greule wrote: > Addresses two simple problems regarding javadocs in the FFM API. I think we can safely backport this to 23, as this is a doc-only fix (I've labeled the JBS issue noreg-doc as well) allowed by JEP-3 for RDP 1 and 2. - PR Comm

Re: RFR: 8334708: FFM: two javadoc problems

2024-06-21 Thread Hannes Greule
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:40:31 GMT, Hannes Greule wrote: > Addresses two simple problems regarding javadocs in the FFM API. Thank you for your review. > Should we backport to 23? I leave that up to you, I don't know how those things are handled normally. But a backport would be very simple in t

Re: RFR: 8334708: FFM: two javadoc problems

2024-06-21 Thread Maurizio Cimadamore
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:40:31 GMT, Hannes Greule wrote: > Addresses two simple problems regarding javadocs in the FFM API. Thanks! Should we backport to 23? - Marked as reviewed by mcimadamore (Reviewer). PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19820#pullrequestreview-213215539