On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 20:10:18 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> For StringBuf proxy, is it acceptible for us to introduce a new jdk.internal
>> public interface (accessible only within java.base module) to expose common
>> public methods in AbstractStringBuilder? We have public types extending or
>> im
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:47:11 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> lingjun-cg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 896: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format
>
> For StringBuf proxy, is it acceptible for us to introduce a new
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:47:11 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> lingjun-cg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 896: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format
>
> For StringBuf proxy, is it acceptible for us to introduce a new
On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 03:19:48 GMT, lingjun-cg wrote:
>> ### Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format
>> From the output of perf, we can see the hottest regions contain atomic
>> instructions. But when run with JDK 11, there is no such problem. The
>> reason is the removed biased locking.
> ### Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format
> From the output of perf, we can see the hottest regions contain atomic
> instructions. But when run with JDK 11, there is no such problem. The reason
> is the removed biased locking.
> The DecimalFormat uses StringBuffer everywhere, and St
