On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 07:17:42 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Hello Glavo, I'll need some more time on this to review this. In the
> meantime, could you update the micro benchmark latest numbers with this
> latest state?
Latest results:
Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Scor
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:38:34 GMT, Glavo wrote:
>> Using `ByteArrayLittleEndian` is simpler and faster.
>>
>> `make test TEST="micro:java.util.zip.ZipFileOpen"`:
>>
>>
>> Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error
>> Units
>> - ZipFileOpen.openCloseZipFile 512
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:38:34 GMT, Glavo wrote:
>> Using `ByteArrayLittleEndian` is simpler and faster.
>>
>> `make test TEST="micro:java.util.zip.ZipFileOpen"`:
>>
>>
>> Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error
>> Units
>> - ZipFileOpen.openCloseZipFile 512
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:38:34 GMT, Glavo wrote:
>> Using `ByteArrayLittleEndian` is simpler and faster.
>>
>> `make test TEST="micro:java.util.zip.ZipFileOpen"`:
>>
>>
>> Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error
>> Units
>> - ZipFileOpen.openCloseZipFile 512
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:38:34 GMT, Glavo wrote:
>> Using `ByteArrayLittleEndian` is simpler and faster.
>>
>> `make test TEST="micro:java.util.zip.ZipFileOpen"`:
>>
>>
>> Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error
>> Units
>> - ZipFileOpen.openCloseZipFile 512
> Using `ByteArrayLittleEndian` is simpler and faster.
>
> `make test TEST="micro:java.util.zip.ZipFileOpen"`:
>
>
> Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
> - ZipFileOpen.openCloseZipFile 512 avgt 15 39052.832 ± 107.496 ns/op
> + ZipFileOpen.ope
