On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 12:20:09 GMT, Jie Fu wrote:
> > Fix is good but change bug type to subtask as Shipilev says.
>
> Done. Thanks @magicus and @shipilev .
I think it is also better be named "Remove use of ThreadDeath from make
utilities" :)
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 12:09:46 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Fix is good but change bug type to subtask as Shipilev says.
Done.
Thanks @magicus and @shipilev .
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10406
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:03:52 GMT, Jie Fu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since `ThreadDeath` would be deprecated soon, I assume it's fine to just
> remove it.
>
> Thanks.
> Best regards,
> Jie
Fix is good but change bug type to subtask as Shipilev says.
In that case it sounds fine. I was worried you'd
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:34:33 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since `ThreadDeath` would be deprecated soon, I assume it's fine to just
>> remove it.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Best regards,
>> Jie
>
> This looks fine, and the current use of `ThreadDeath` does not even seem
> correct (you h
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:34:33 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since `ThreadDeath` would be deprecated soon, I assume it's fine to just
>> remove it.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Best regards,
>> Jie
>
> This looks fine, and the current use of `ThreadDeath` does not even seem
> correct (you h
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:03:52 GMT, Jie Fu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since `ThreadDeath` would be deprecated soon, I assume it's fine to just
> remove it.
>
> Thanks.
> Best regards,
> Jie
This looks fine, and the current use of `ThreadDeath` does not even seem
correct (you have to rethrow it). But
