On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:13:48 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
>> Please review this specification update for `SimpleDateFormat` which
>> explicitly specifies the behavior for 'reserved' pattern letters. This is a
>> specification update and has the potential low risk of making an
>> implementation non-co
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:13:48 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
>> Please review this specification update for `SimpleDateFormat` which
>> explicitly specifies the behavior for 'reserved' pattern letters. This is a
>> specification update and has the potential low risk of making an
>> implementation non-co
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:13:48 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
>> Please review this specification update for `SimpleDateFormat` which
>> explicitly specifies the behavior for 'reserved' pattern letters. This is a
>> specification update and has the potential low risk of making an
>> implementation non-co
> Please review this specification update for `SimpleDateFormat` which
> explicitly specifies the behavior for 'reserved' pattern letters. This is a
> specification update and has the potential low risk of making an
> implementation non-compliant. Thus, an associated CSR is filed.
Justin Lu has
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 21:21:20 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
> Please review this specification update for `SimpleDateFormat` which
> explicitly specifies the behavior for 'reserved' pattern letters. This is a
> specification update and has the potential low risk of making an
> implementation non-compli
