Re: RFR: JDK-8322878: Including sealing information Class.toGenericString() [v7]

2024-01-10 Thread Joe Darcy
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 18:27:45 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote: > > /contributor add @pavelrappo > > Thanks, Joe. Making me an "overriding author" was a bit over the top. :) Skimmed the docs too quickly when looking for a "co-author" command :-) - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull

Re: RFR: JDK-8322878: Including sealing information Class.toGenericString() [v7]

2024-01-10 Thread Roger Riggs
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 18:16:05 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: >> As recently discussed on core libs, sealed-ness information could be >> included in the Class.toGenericString() output, analagous to how "modifiers" >> that also correspond to JVM access flags are handled. >> >> This is the initial spec, im

Re: RFR: JDK-8322878: Including sealing information Class.toGenericString() [v7]

2024-01-10 Thread Pavel Rappo
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 18:16:05 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: >> As recently discussed on core libs, sealed-ness information could be >> included in the Class.toGenericString() output, analagous to how "modifiers" >> that also correspond to JVM access flags are handled. >> >> This is the initial spec, im

Re: RFR: JDK-8322878: Including sealing information Class.toGenericString() [v7]

2024-01-10 Thread Joe Darcy
> As recently discussed on core libs, sealed-ness information could be included > in the Class.toGenericString() output, analagous to how "modifiers" that also > correspond to JVM access flags are handled. > > This is the initial spec, implementation, and test updated needed for that > change.