> Use of javadoc search index feature; I'll re-flow paragraphs before pushing
> once the wording is agreed to.
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Reflow-paragraphs.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:32:26 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> This looks okay to me. You might want to move the "For a" on L58 to the next
> line to avoid L58 stick out too much, up to you.
Sure; I usually prefer to re-flow the paragraphs after the text changes are
agreed to so the difference is eas
> Use of javadoc search index feature; I'll re-flow paragraphs before pushing
> once the wording is agreed to.
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Respond to review feedback.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.ope
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 13:00:40 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> What about `semi-monotonic` on L.80? Does it deserve to be tagged as
> `` and indexed?
Good idea; added. The term "IEEE 754" is already index from various section
titles so I didn't add an index item for that explicitly.
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 04:52:59 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Use of javadoc search index feature; I'll re-flow paragraphs before pushing
> once the wording is agreed to.
What about `semi-monotonic` on L.80?
Does it deserve to be tagged as `` and indexed?
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.o
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 04:52:59 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Use of javadoc search index feature; I'll re-flow paragraphs before pushing
> once the wording is agreed to.
This looks okay to me. You might want to move the "For a" on L58 to the next
line to avoid L58 stick out too much, up to you.
-
Use of javadoc search index feature; I'll re-flow paragraphs before pushing
once the wording is agreed to.
-
Commit messages:
- JDK-8314489: Add javadoc index entries for java.lang.Math terms
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15322/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org