On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:31:50 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Please review this fix to
> [JDK-8353185](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353185). The reading logic
> for the config file would erroneously use `scanner.nextLine()` when the
> current line to be added is in `line`. `line` is not
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:31:50 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Please review this fix to
> [JDK-8353185](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353185). The reading logic
> for the config file would erroneously use `scanner.nextLine()` when the
> current line to be added is in `line`. `line` is not
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:31:50 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Please review this fix to
> [JDK-8353185](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353185). The reading logic
> for the config file would erroneously use `scanner.nextLine()` when the
> current line to be added is in `line`. `line` is not
Please review this fix to
[JDK-8353185](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353185). The reading logic
for the config file would erroneously use `scanner.nextLine()` when the current
line to be added is in `line`. `line` is not being added, but
`scanner.nextLine()` unintentionally skipping lin