On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 04:49:03 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional
>> c
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 04:49:03 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional
>> c
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 04:45:00 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional
>> c
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 04:49:03 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> I see that you're actively on the upgradeable files. What about #24190?
Let's keep the discussion on #24190, please.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24388#issuecomment-2782507174
On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 15:22:10 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> For JEP 493-enabled builds there are no JMODs. Certain files come from the
>> installed JDK image when a user creates a custom run-time from it. This is
>> problematic for example for files that often come from a different package
>> (
On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 15:22:10 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> For JEP 493-enabled builds there are no JMODs. Certain files come from the
>> installed JDK image when a user creates a custom run-time from it. This is
>> problematic for example for files that often come from a different package
>> (
> For JEP 493-enabled builds there are no JMODs. Certain files come from the
> installed JDK image when a user creates a custom run-time from it. This is
> problematic for example for files that often come from a different package
> (e.g. `cacerts` file for Linux distro builds of OpenJDK package
