On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 20:07:26 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> The current test program for the logging feature added in JDK-8301627 does
>> not fully check some important cases.
>>
>> Issue Details:
>> The test does not properly check cases where logging might not happen due to
>> different logging
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 09:05:27 GMT, KIRIYAMA Takuya wrote:
>> The current test program for the logging feature added in JDK-8301627 does
>> not fully check some important cases.
>>
>> Issue Details:
>> The test does not properly check cases where logging might not happen due to
>> different logg
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 09:17:06 GMT, KIRIYAMA Takuya wrote:
> The current test program for the logging feature added in JDK-8301627 does
> not fully check some important cases.
>
> Issue Details:
> The test does not properly check cases where logging might not happen due to
> different logging le
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 20:09:51 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> KIRIYAMA Takuya has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8352016: Improve java/lang/RuntimeTests/RuntimeExitLogTest.java
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/RuntimeTests/ExitLogging-FINER
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 09:01:01 GMT, KIRIYAMA Takuya wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/lang/RuntimeTests/RuntimeExitLogTest.java line 52:
>>
>>> 50: private static final String TEST_JDK =
>>> System.getProperty("test.jdk");
>>> 51: private static final String TEST_SRC =
>>> System.getProperty("test
> The current test program for the logging feature added in JDK-8301627 does
> not fully check some important cases.
>
> Issue Details:
> The test does not properly check cases where logging might not happen due to
> different logging levels. (e.g. ALL, TRACE, WARNING, etc.)
> The check for the
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 18:39:22 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> I see. This test only takes a very short time, but shouldn't the cases be
>> added?
>
> Still no, starting a new Java runtime isn't that quick, and it brings no
> additional value.
> All tests are run 10's of thousands of times in every re
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:24:20 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> KIRIYAMA Takuya has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8352016: Improve java/lang/RuntimeTests/RuntimeExitLogTest.java
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/RuntimeTests/RuntimeExitLogTe
> The current test program for the logging feature added in JDK-8301627 does
> not fully check some important cases.
>
> Issue Details:
> The test does not properly check cases where logging might not happen due to
> different logging levels. (e.g. ALL, TRACE, WARNING, etc.)
> The check for the
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 09:06:14 GMT, KIRIYAMA Takuya wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/lang/RuntimeTests/ExitLogging-FINER.properties line 8:
>>
>>> 6:
>>> 7: java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.level = ALL
>>> 8: java.lang.Runtime.level = FINER
>>
>> It is a waste of resources to test every combination of lo
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 19:54:41 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> KIRIYAMA Takuya has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8352016: Improve java/lang/RuntimeTests/RuntimeExitLogTest.java
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/RuntimeTests/ExitLogging-FINE.
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 20:07:26 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what raised this as an issue that needed more tests? Was
> there a failure of some implementation that caused a bug?
Thank you for your comment.
No, I haven't found any bugs yet.
This is an important feature that is often
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:34:37 GMT, Mikhail Yankelevich
wrote:
>> KIRIYAMA Takuya has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8352016: Improve java/lang/RuntimeTests/RuntimeExitLogTest.java
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/RuntimeTests/RuntimeE
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 09:17:06 GMT, KIRIYAMA Takuya wrote:
> The current test program for the logging feature added in JDK-8301627 does
> not fully check some important cases.
>
> Issue Details:
> The test does not properly check cases where logging might not happen due to
> different logging le
The current test program for the logging feature added in JDK-8301627 does not
fully check some important cases.
Issue Details:
The test does not properly check cases where logging might not happen due to
different logging levels. (e.g. ALL, TRACE, WARNING, etc.)
The check for the logged stack t
15 matches
Mail list logo
