Re: RFR: 8349624: Validation for slot missing in CodeBuilder local variable instructions

2025-02-11 Thread Chen Liang
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:40:44 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: > In CodeBuilder, validation for a slot was missing due to concurrent patches, > and the original patch did not add effective tests for CodeBuilder because of > the complex exceptional behaviors. Now the bug is fixed with renames to > prevent

Re: RFR: 8349624: Validation for slot missing in CodeBuilder local variable instructions

2025-02-10 Thread Adam Sotona
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:40:44 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: > In CodeBuilder, validation for a slot was missing due to concurrent patches, > and the original patch did not add effective tests for CodeBuilder because of > the complex exceptional behaviors. Now the bug is fixed with renames to > prevent

RFR: 8349624: Validation for slot missing in CodeBuilder local variable instructions

2025-02-07 Thread Chen Liang
In CodeBuilder, validation for a slot was missing due to concurrent patches, and the original patch did not add effective tests for CodeBuilder because of the complex exceptional behaviors. Now the bug is fixed with renames to prevent future risky usages, and the tests have been enhanced to ensu