Re: RFR: 8349200: [JMH] time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark fails [v2]

2025-02-04 Thread SendaoYan
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 02:40:59 GMT, SendaoYan wrote: >> Hi all, >> The JMH test >> "org.openjdk.bench.java.time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse" >> fails "java.time.format.DateTimeParseException: Text '2015:03:10:12:13:ECT' >> could not be parsed at index 17". >> The `ECT` standard f

Re: RFR: 8349200: [JMH] time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark fails [v2]

2025-02-04 Thread Naoto Sato
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 02:40:59 GMT, SendaoYan wrote: >> Hi all, >> The JMH test >> "org.openjdk.bench.java.time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse" >> fails "java.time.format.DateTimeParseException: Text '2015:03:10:12:13:ECT' >> could not be parsed at index 17". >> The `ECT` standard f

Re: RFR: 8349200: [JMH] time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark fails

2025-02-03 Thread SendaoYan
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 22:18:51 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: > If we need more practical short name, "PST" might not be a bad choice. I think use "Pacific Standard Time - PST" is a more practical chioce. The PR has been updated. - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23414#issuecomm

Re: RFR: 8349200: [JMH] time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark fails [v2]

2025-02-03 Thread SendaoYan
> Hi all, > The JMH test > "org.openjdk.bench.java.time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse" > fails "java.time.format.DateTimeParseException: Text '2015:03:10:12:13:ECT' > could not be parsed at index 17". > The `ECT` standard for "America/Guayaquil" - "Ecuador Time", and since jdk23

Re: RFR: 8349200: [JMH] time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark fails

2025-02-03 Thread SendaoYan
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 22:18:51 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: > most likely the failure was due to the removal of COMPAT locale provide Yes. git bisect result shows that the failure was due to PR "8174269: Remove COMPAT locale data provider from JDK" And, use jdk22, the difference between '-Djava.locale

Re: RFR: 8349200: [JMH] time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark fails

2025-02-03 Thread Naoto Sato
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 07:49:21 GMT, SendaoYan wrote: > Hi all, > The JMH test > "org.openjdk.bench.java.time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse" > fails "java.time.format.DateTimeParseException: Text '2015:03:10:12:13:ECT' > could not be parsed at index 17". > The `ECT` standard for "Am

Re: RFR: 8349200: [JMH] time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark fails

2025-02-03 Thread Justin Lu
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 07:49:21 GMT, SendaoYan wrote: > Hi all, > The JMH test > "org.openjdk.bench.java.time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse" > fails "java.time.format.DateTimeParseException: Text '2015:03:10:12:13:ECT' > could not be parsed at index 17". > The `ECT` standard for "Am

RFR: 8349200: [JMH] time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark fails

2025-02-03 Thread SendaoYan
Hi all, The JMH test "org.openjdk.bench.java.time.format.ZonedDateTimeFormatterBenchmark.parse" fails "java.time.format.DateTimeParseException: Text '2015:03:10:12:13:ECT' could not be parsed at index 17". The `ECT` standard for "America/Guayaquil" - "Ecuador Time", and since jdk23 the `ECT` Ti